<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Nuclear Green?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.morganenergy.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.morganenergy.com/?p=290</link>
	<description>Discussing Energy Economics on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:18:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.morganenergy.com/?p=290&#038;cpage=1#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morganenergy.com/?p=290#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Mike:

I&#039;m sure that nukes can be flexible, but should we want them to? A nuclear power station humming along at a constant output is generally fairly safe. Start messing with the rods and all sorts of things could go wrong. I&#039;m afraid that whenever I hear people suggesting that nukes could load-follow I have this mental vision of Homer Simpson getting instructions from a Wall Street trader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that nukes can be flexible, but should we want them to? A nuclear power station humming along at a constant output is generally fairly safe. Start messing with the rods and all sorts of things could go wrong. I&#8217;m afraid that whenever I hear people suggesting that nukes could load-follow I have this mental vision of Homer Simpson getting instructions from a Wall Street trader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Giberson</title>
		<link>http://www.morganenergy.com/?p=290&#038;cpage=1#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Giberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.morganenergy.com/?p=290#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Most nuclear units are designed to operate as full-time, baseload units, but at least a few analysts have concluded that it isn&#039;t inherent in the technical characteristics so much as it is dictated by the economics (In too simple terms: high capital costs + low marginal operating cost = once operating, operate as much as possible).

See, for example, the paper by Pouret and Nuttall, &quot;Can Nuclear Power Be Flexible?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most nuclear units are designed to operate as full-time, baseload units, but at least a few analysts have concluded that it isn&#8217;t inherent in the technical characteristics so much as it is dictated by the economics (In too simple terms: high capital costs + low marginal operating cost = once operating, operate as much as possible).</p>
<p>See, for example, the paper by Pouret and Nuttall, &#8220;Can Nuclear Power Be Flexible?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
